Medicine can come in many form and variations. The method of intake may also vary. But if there was anything you can be sure of, it is that all these are created by pharmaceutical companies. Another things about this industry is how there are not many that manufacture medicine. This may even be considered as a monopolization of such an industry.
Tablet compression was once a manual method, but with the development of technology, manufacturers have found a way to automate the process. This makes assembly line production of tablets and the like easier. Tablet punches and dies are popular machines to assist in tooling.
It becomes a different story for the manufacturers. The standardization of these parts and equipment in machinery can save so much in overhead expenses. Tablets, specifically, come in different forms and sizes. Its dosage can differ without changing its physical form, but the question remains to be why they all look different. Standardization is meant to address these differences to solve manufacturing difficulties.
Specifications for these products vary from one standard to another. So far there are two widely used standards for tablet compressions. One is the European ISO and second is the TSM or the tablet Specification Manual, most commonly used in North America. These dies and punches may only have a a few differences but their individual effects vary and have a huge impact on the product.
These are the European ISO, used in Europe and mostly outside the US and the Tablet Specification Manual standards used by mostly North American Manufacturing. This is a big deal for manufacturers that have plants around the world. Not having a set of the same metrics to follow mean extra expenses. Resources are expended to qualify the product and equipment for it to be allowable in that certain location.
One, there would be no need to have varying metrics and qualification for any operational inspections on the machinery. This can be different from one standard to another since even the smallest difference can mean a lot of change, on a medicinal level. Any fixes and replacements on the machinery parts become easier because the Original Equipment Manufacturers do not need to make different punches and dies that would fit the many standards that are in the industry.
As an effect, maintenance and procurement of the minor parts are easier. Interchangeability of these things also become possible because everything is compatible. This would help manufacturers from buying different machinery just to suit standards that may be different from one location to another resulting to lower overall costs.
Standardization for this process has been discussed and conceptualized since the early 90s. While the goal of only having one set of qualifications for tablet production is still not available, the ISO or International Organization for Standardization has approved the European standard back in the mid 90s. Despite this achievement towards the goal, the TSM is still practiced.
There is a call for some standardization for something that is so seemingly minor as nominal punch length, rotation and so on. This allows for better problem solving and addressing issues from one expert to another since there would be no specialized knowledge needed to address the technical difficulty. More importantly the quality of the products made would be uniformed and anything that goes beyond this uniformity can be easily checked and inspected.
Tablet compression was once a manual method, but with the development of technology, manufacturers have found a way to automate the process. This makes assembly line production of tablets and the like easier. Tablet punches and dies are popular machines to assist in tooling.
It becomes a different story for the manufacturers. The standardization of these parts and equipment in machinery can save so much in overhead expenses. Tablets, specifically, come in different forms and sizes. Its dosage can differ without changing its physical form, but the question remains to be why they all look different. Standardization is meant to address these differences to solve manufacturing difficulties.
Specifications for these products vary from one standard to another. So far there are two widely used standards for tablet compressions. One is the European ISO and second is the TSM or the tablet Specification Manual, most commonly used in North America. These dies and punches may only have a a few differences but their individual effects vary and have a huge impact on the product.
These are the European ISO, used in Europe and mostly outside the US and the Tablet Specification Manual standards used by mostly North American Manufacturing. This is a big deal for manufacturers that have plants around the world. Not having a set of the same metrics to follow mean extra expenses. Resources are expended to qualify the product and equipment for it to be allowable in that certain location.
One, there would be no need to have varying metrics and qualification for any operational inspections on the machinery. This can be different from one standard to another since even the smallest difference can mean a lot of change, on a medicinal level. Any fixes and replacements on the machinery parts become easier because the Original Equipment Manufacturers do not need to make different punches and dies that would fit the many standards that are in the industry.
As an effect, maintenance and procurement of the minor parts are easier. Interchangeability of these things also become possible because everything is compatible. This would help manufacturers from buying different machinery just to suit standards that may be different from one location to another resulting to lower overall costs.
Standardization for this process has been discussed and conceptualized since the early 90s. While the goal of only having one set of qualifications for tablet production is still not available, the ISO or International Organization for Standardization has approved the European standard back in the mid 90s. Despite this achievement towards the goal, the TSM is still practiced.
There is a call for some standardization for something that is so seemingly minor as nominal punch length, rotation and so on. This allows for better problem solving and addressing issues from one expert to another since there would be no specialized knowledge needed to address the technical difficulty. More importantly the quality of the products made would be uniformed and anything that goes beyond this uniformity can be easily checked and inspected.
About the Author:
If you are looking for information about tablet punches and dies, come to our web pages here. More details can be seen at http://www.tabtooling.com now.
No comments:
Post a Comment